Strip Scar Thin As a Pencil

I’m told by various strip physicians that the strip scar is a thin as a pencil mark. Is this true?

This is completely dishonest. The average strip scar is 2 to 3 mm wide and it can stretch from ear to ear. If you plan to cut your hair short, this can be a problem for you as it is obviously a man made scar. It is an obvious sign that you had a hair transplant. No one wants anyone to know they’ve had a hair transplant, however. No one wants anyone to know they had hair loss or that they ever considered hair restoration surgery. Even shorter hair styles can expose the strip hair transplant scar. Frequently we are told that a hair cut of a number 3 or shorter exposes the strip scar form a strip hair transplant.

There is a new fallacy you are hearing from strip surgeons, as well. They claim that their new trichophytic closure technique produces pencil thin scars that are invisible. We’ve seen 5mm wide scars produced by this technique. Five millimeters is ¼ inch wide. It is a huge gap with no hair in it. When the trichophytic closure works, it rarely works in the rear of the scalp. You will not see an advantage along the sides of the scalp usually. Furthermore, the tighter you make the scalp by performing successive strip procedures, the more likely it is that your scar will widen and stretch out. Furthermore, these strip scars can turn whiter than the surrounding skin or bright pink. This produces further contrast to the scars should they be exposed by a short hair cut or by a medical illness that causes thinning or loss of your hair.

One other problem you will never hear about from your strip surgeon is tThin Donor strip scarshat strip procedure causes irreversible changes in your donor area hair growth angles. A strip is nothing more than a scalp reduction in the donor area. It alters hair growth angles for the rest of your life.

There is no reason to have a strip procedure. It really is up to the patient to demand the alternative, which is far better. Patients should begin to demand CIT, which is an advancement over our older FIT procedure. There is CIT and no quite CIT. Many physicians will tell you they perform FUE. This FUE procedure does not meet the quality of CIT. CIT is a proprietary procedure with quality instrumentation. Only CIT has proven results day in and day out with all types of hair including wiry, kinky hair seen in men of African decent.

(Read The full Article » » » »)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dr. Cole Reveals C2G Video Demonstration

This video demonstration was taken during live hair transplant surgery with one of Dr. Cole’s patients.  With strip harvesting or traditional FUE, the patients are very limited in their personal appearance and have difficulties getting back to normal daily activities because they are asked to shave their head.
Shaving the head allows the physician to have high visibility of the donor area which is necessary for donor hair extraction. With the new C2G technique, the patients are able to keep their normal hair style before and after the CIT technique!
Now patients can have the best of both worlds. They no longer have to put up with the pain associated with strip scars and they can still maintain their normal hair style.

 
icon for podpress  Online Video [2:00m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (298)

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Strip Scars Grafting and Camouflaging

What are the ways to camouflage strip hair restoration scars?

Camouflaging Strip Scars

Scars in the donor area from strip harvests may be problematic for many men. They may be short or run from ear to ear. Sometimes they widen over time, occasionally to more than two centimeters, which is deforming. This is usually due to an overly tight scalp, too low a placement, or poor surgical technique. They also change the direction of hair growth below the scar, relative to above the scar, which may cause a “shadow” of the linear scar to be evident even with the hair grown out somewhat.

IN order to minimize the appearance of scars, several strategies are available. There are cosmetics such as Dermatch, which may help disguise the scar. The hair may also be grown out fairly long to attempt coverage. This, of course, may not be an option for those with an over harvested donor region.

Surgical scar revision may be attempted, often without success. This consists of excising the scar and them suturing up the wound, hoping that the resultant scar will look better than the original one. This can work in some instances; however, if the condition that led to the scarring is not remedied, then even the best revision may fail.

Grafting into the scar is another option. Because yields tend to be lower in scars, this may take more than one surgical procedure over many months to have a significant cosmetic effect. Either body or scalp hair may be used; scalp hair is generally a better choice if it is available.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Dr. Cole, What Is The C2G Stand For?

Dr. Cole, what is the C2G stand for?

C2G stands for the Cole Isolation technique to go or CIT to go. CIT is a proprietary method of harvesting individual follicular units one at a time such that there is no need for a strip harvest. Strip harvests leave linear scars and no one can predict how wide the scar will be or whether it will be pale white in color or red in color. Either way the strip harvest leaves you will a linear scar that obviates your capacity to wear your hair short and leaves you vulnerable to others suspecting you’ve had a hair transplant previously. Often patients are so concerned about their strip scar that they cease going to a barber or hair stylist for fear of exposure.

In an effort to overcome this social stigma we developed the CIT procedure. The single negative to this procedure has been the requirement for patients to shave the donor area. This can result in problems blending back into society or into one’s work place. The goal of C2G was to develop a procedure that allows patients to keep their hair long so that they can return to their normal social environment within a few days.

C2G is a procedure where only individual follicular units are trimmed and the resulting individual follicular units are then transferred to the top of the scalp after harvesting them via CIT. Only the individual follicular units are trimmed so that you have a normal appearing donor area from day one and you also have the advantage of avoiding the strip scar altogether. Now there is no reason to avoid taking advantage of all the long term benefits of CIT. This includes no linear strip scar, no prolonged strip scar pain, no prolonged strip scar tightness or numbness in the donor area, more hair per graft (more bang for you buck), and a lower follicular injury rate (transaction rate).

There was once a draw back to CIT. Now there is none. C2G is the future of hair restoration surgery.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

CIT Hair Transplant by John P. Cole, MD

I would like to know what is the CIT hair transplant? why is it better then the strip?

CIT or “The Cole Isolation Technique” (former known as FIT) is a hair transplant harvesting technique developed by Dr. John P. Cole in the early years of this century. It is similar, but not identical to, FUE, or follicular unit extraction. CIT uses proprietary technology and instruments to harvest intact follicular groups ranging from 1 to as many as 6 or more individual hairs along with their intact dermal elements. It must be stressed that these dermal elements are essential for the growth of new hairs in the recipient areas (these are the areas of thinning or balding that are being transplanted). Extracting hairs without the dermal elements is easy, but amounts to nothing more than a “pluck”; these hairs will not grow.
As with any other harvesting method, the hair transplant surgeon will first outline the donor areas to be harvested, as well as the areas which will be receiving the harvested grafts later on. Then, local anesthetic is infiltrated into the donor area to render the skin and deeper structures numb and insensitive to pain. Then, just before harvesting begins, the area is injected with a “tumescent” fluid consisting of saline, and often medications to minimize bleeding. This tumescent technique is fairly common in a number of cosmetic procedures. It is beneficial in a number of ways; it helps decrease bleeding with medications and also by virtue of the pressure of the fluid on blood vessels in the tissue; it brings the skin up and away from deeper structures; it provides a taut, firm surface on which to score the skin, and it slightly separates the follicular groups from each other so that they may be more easily isolated from one another.
Then, the skin around the follicular groups is scored with the special instruments; the surrounding tissues are teased away from the follicles and then the entire unit, that is, the hair shafts, the dermal elements surrounding the shafts, the sebaceous glands and a tiny ring of skin at the top is gently pulled out. The graft is perfect, and ready for placement in the recipient area. No trimming or preparation is generally needed. This is one of many benefits of CIT compared with the older style strip harvest method, which requires microscopic dissecting of all grafts prior to placement, necessitating a large team using stereo microscopes.
Healing of the tiny sites from which the grafts are pulled commences almost immediately. Usually by the second or third day, the tissue has grown in to cover the hole and there remains only a pale pink dot at the site. In some individuals, this may eventually appear as a slight “white dotting”, which is not strictly speaking a scar, but rather an area of hypopigmentation. This just means that the cells within the follicles that produce the dark pigment called melanin are gone, and the skin here is a slightly lighter shade than the adjacent skin. This phenomenon is relatively unpredictable; it is most common in darker complexioned people, but may manifest in pale-skinned folks. Likewise, it may occur after CIT with very small instruments, and not at all with larger-sized extractors (or vice versa!)
We feel that, compared to a linear, ear-to-ear strip scar, these tiny white dots have minimal negative cosmetic impact. With the hair only a few millimeters long, these dots are undetectable. A strip scar, on the other hand, may be visible with the hair considerably longer, and it may widen, sometimes for no apparent reason. In addition, the strip scar changes the direction of hair growth below it, relative to the direction above it. Unless a person desires to wet shave their hair down to the skin, these white dots, if they do occur, are invisible to the casual observer.
Now, once the grafts are extracted and ready for implantation, the process is quite similar to strip harvest hair transplant surgery. Tiny jeweler’s forceps are used to very gently grasp the hair-bearing grafts and place them into miniscule recipient sites. These sites are created by the hair transplant surgeon using various blades or needles; each site is made carefully and with a deliberately natural pattern. The angle relative to the axis of the head is extremely important, because the hair normally grows in specific patterns. These patterns have a general similarity in all people, but there are specific ways in which these patterns diverge in individuals. A “cowlick” at the frontal hairline is a good example, as is a unique “whorl” at the vertex or crown. It is often appropriate to closely mimic the existing pattern to obtain the most natural effect.
The so-called angle of emergence is of utmost importance as well. This is the angle at which the hair emerges from the scalp. This angle may be quite acute, that is, the hair may lie down very close to the plane of the scalp. If an inexperienced or minimally gifted surgeon makes these angles too high, then the look will be peculiar and unnatural. We have seen many cases such as this, and it is especially noticeable at the leading edge of the frontal hairline; follicles growing on the hairline at or close to a 90 degree angle are an aesthetic and cosmetic disaster.
Regional placement of various graft sizes is another challenge for inexperienced surgeons. One hair grafts ONLY should be placed at the leading edge of the hairline. Two hair grafts are then placed behind these “singles”; the “full-sized” three, four, or larger grafts are only placed further back behind the soft, feathered hairline. We commonly see repair cases with two, three, and even four hair grafts all over the frontal hairline! Fortunately, we can now remove these unsightly, inappropriately-placed grafts with the CIT technique and redistribute them further back where they rightly belong.
As with all hair transplants, the hair shafts themselves, which are essentially dead protein, will begin to shed at about 2 to 3 weeks. However, the follicular germinal elements are safely lying dormant beneath the skin. Usually at about 3 to 4 months, the first “new” hairs will begin to emerge. There will continue to be further growth for up to a year or more, but usually the full cosmetic effect will be evident at about 12 months.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Page 1 of 212»

Ask A Question! | Site Map | Valid XHTML | CSS| Contact

© 2007 HairLossPress- All rights reserved.